More on the Swine Flu: Research and a Little Perspective

The swine flu continues to spread, especially in the wintry southern hemisphere countries, as expected. Even here in the U.S. and in other northern hemisphere countries, though, new cases are popping up everyday despite the summer weather. As of this post, for example, there are 7,500 confirmed cases in the United Kingdom, one of whom is a recovering Ron Weasley. Maryland reported 166 confirmed cases just in the last week of June alone.

In two new studies, one from the U.S. and one from the Netherlands, the H1N1 virus not only entered the lungs of ferret test subjects more deeply than the seasonal flu does, but it also entered the GI tract. The ferrets also lost more weight and displayed more widespread disease with swine flu than with seasonal flu, and all these results could mean that H1N1 sticks around for awhile. The one bright spot in the research comes from the U.S. study, which suggests H1N1 does not spread as efficiently as the seasonal flu does.

As I’ve been reading all this news and research, lately I’ve noticed the pendulum swinging all the way from panic over the swine flu to the other extreme.

I’m talking about deliberate, proud nonchalance, the virtual pats on the back people give themselves for staying calm and reasonable in the face of this pandemic. If you read blogs as often as I do or even if you have a Facebook account, I’m sure you’ve noticed the same trend, the same swine flu jokes, and the same blog posts from parents who brag they are still sending their kids to summer camp even with H1N1 going around.

Which, okay. If people aren’t worried, okay. That’s good. Great, even.

Plus, I recognize the coping mechanism of making jokes about the scary things in life. What bothers me, though, is the implied criticism in these sorts of posts, the smugness and the unwritten judgment that anyone not as cavalier about the pandemic as these writers are must therefore be neurotic or at least uninformed about the nature of this outbreak.

That, of course, is just not the case. I worry, and I can safely say I’ve read more and understand more about the swine flu that just about everyone I know. People who shrug off this pandemic casually are usually able to do so because they’re lucky enough not to have a reason to worry. A reason, for instance, like having a kid with asthma, one of those “underlying medical conditions” the newspaper keeps mentioning in the stories about swine flu deaths. Some of us don’t have the luxury of nonchalance.

Others that don’t have that luxury? Citizens of developing countries, where high incidences of other diseases like AIDS or TB and under-equipped health care could turn H1N1 into much deadlier crisis than it is here in my country. The danger level is so high in third world regions, actually, that the UN wants $1 billion to help them prepare.

I’m glad people aren’t panicking. I really am. As I’ve written a time or five on this blog, panic helps no one. And I’m happy for – if somewhat jealous of – those parents whose children don’t have a chronic lung condition that puts them at higher risk. However, there is a midline between blind panic and the “I’m not worried, so nobody should worry” judgments.

Click here to learn more about H1N1 and asthma.